![]() ![]() The significantly higher energy consumption, which destroys the good energy balance that's found out of the box, is not something to sneer at either.ĭue to the high temperatures under load with the increased PT, we don't recommend overclocking the graphics card with the standard cooler. However, the performance increase is within the single-digit range so that it's not worth overclocking the graphics card in the reference design. We were able to achieve slightly better results in the synthetic benchmarks when testing it. The RTX graphics card from Nvidia behaved a lot more friendly here, which concerns the VRAM. Disappointment followed quickly since there was virtually no room for modifications with the RAM. That's a fact, and it can't be sugar coated.ĭespite the high temperatures, we made an attempt at overclocking the AMD RX 5700. The Radeon RX 5700 is indeed significantly louder under load compared to Nvidia's RTX 2060S FE. When more power is introduced, as is the case with the RX 5700 XT, more heat needs to be dissipated too. We also need to consider that the RX 5700 only has a power consumption of 180 watts. Only under load does the fan become a bit louder, but it's still acceptable. Case fans or hard drives are almost louder here. It is barely audible in 2D usage despite the radial fan. However, a good air flow should be available with both forms of cooling so that no heat accumulation is produced.īut now back to the AMD Radeon RX 5700. ![]() That Nvidia abstained from using this type of cooling solution since the introduction of the RTX graphics cards is a known thing, and the GPU still manages to cool itself in a reliable and comparatively quite way. In principle, this form of cooling isn't a bad approach since it causes the resulting heat to be directly conducted towards the outside of the case under load. In this way, the graphics card is always audible if you have sensitive hearing. This has a diameter of 75 mm and also spins happily in 2D scenarios. In terms of emissions, we'll start with the loudness of the graphics card. Although AMD also gives the smaller Navi variant a cooling unit including a vapor chamber, as is so often the case, AMD gives its graphics cards a radial fan in the reference design. Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) The significantly higher production costs wouldn't have any relationship with the little increase in performance. In contrast to the RX Vega 64 with 483.8 GB/s, this is a drawback that can be accepted. The memory bandwidth is therefore 448 GB/s. They both have the same clock speeds of 7000 MHz too. AMD isn't at a disadvantage here in comparison to Nvidia since the RTX 2060S is equipped with the same VRAM. Although using HBM2 would be possible, AMD went with the lower priced solution. Regarding VRAM, AMD chose GDDR6 for the first time. In this way, the game frequency for the RX 5700 is 1625 MHz. This is an average value since the full boost isn't reached all the time. AMD also gives the game frequency now, which can be expected when gaming. ![]() The base frequency of the smaller Navi 10 GPU is 1465 MHz, while the maximum boost frequency is 1725 MHz. As can be gathered from the image on the right side, AMD provides three different clock speeds for the Radeon RX 5700.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |